Adoremus, Society for the Renewal of the Sacred Liturgy
Vol. XVI, No. 2
The Wounded Liturgy
by Bishop Marc Aillet
Bishop Marc Aillet, of Bayonne, France, gave this address at a theological conference entitled “Fidelity of Christ, Fidelity of the Priest”, held March 11-12 at the Pontifical Lateran University.
Bishop Aillet, who studied theology at the University of Fribourg, was formerly professor of moral theology at the major seminary of the diocese of Toulon. He was appointed bishop of Bayonne in October 2008. The text of Bishop Aillet’s address appeared in both Italian and French on the web site of the Congregation for the Clergy (www.clerus.org). The English translation is by Gregor Kollmorgen, for the New Liturgical Movement (www.newliturgicalmovement.org), with our minor changes. Ed.
At the origin of the Liturgical Movement, it was the will of Pope Saint Pius X, especially in the motu proprio Tra le Sollecitudini (1903), to restore the liturgy and make its riches more accessible in order for it to become again the source of an authentically Christian life, to underscore the challenge of a growing secularization and to encourage the faithful to consecrate the world to God. Thence, the Council’s definition of the liturgy as “source and summit of the life and mission of the Church”.
Against all expectations, as has often been pointed out by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, the implementation of the liturgical reform has sometimes led to a kind of systematic desacralization, while the liturgy was allowed to become ever more pervaded by the secularized culture of the surrounding world, thus losing its own nature and its identity: “This mystery of Christ the Church proclaims and celebrates in her liturgy so that the faithful may live from it and bear witness to it in the world” (CCC 1068).
Without denying the true fruits of the liturgical reform, one can say however, that the liturgy has been wounded by what John Paul II has defined as “unacceptable practices” (Ecclesia de Eucharistia §10), and that Benedict XVI denounced as “deformations which were hard to bear” (Letter to the bishops on the occasion of the publication of the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum). Thus also the identity of the Church and of the priest was wounded.
In the years after the Council, we witnessed a kind of dialectical opposition between the defenders of liturgical worship and the promoters of the opening to the world. Because the latter ultimately reduced the Christian life to social efforts alone, based on a secular interpretation of the faith, the former, in reaction, took refuge in the pure liturgy up to “rubricism”, with the risk of encouraging the faithful to protect themselves excessively from the world.
In the Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis, Pope Benedict XVI puts an end to this controversy and reunites this opposition. Liturgical action must reconcile faith and life. Precisely as the celebration of the Paschal Mystery of Christ, made truly present among His people, the liturgy gives a Eucharistic form to the whole Christian life to make it a “spiritual worship pleasing to God” [§70]. Thus, the commitment of the Christian in the world and the world itself, through the liturgy are called to be consecrated to God.
The commitment of the Christian to the mission of the Church and within society finds, in fact, its source and its impulse in the liturgy being drawn into the dynamism of the offering of the love of Christ that is made present therein.
The primacy that Benedict XVI intends to give the liturgy in the life of the Church (“Liturgical worship is the supreme expression of priestly and episcopal life”, he told the bishops of France gathered in Lourdes on September 14, 2008, in an Extraordinary Plenary Assembly) returns adoration to the center of the life of the priest and of the faithful. Instead and in place of “secular Christianity” that has often accompanied the implementation of the reform of the liturgy, Pope Benedict XVI intends to promote a “theological Christianity”, the only one able to serve what he has called the priority that predominates in this phase of history, i.e., “to make God present in this world and to give people access to God” (Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church, March 10, 2009). Where, in fact, better than in the liturgy, does the priest deepen his identity, so well defined by the author of Hebrews: “For every high priest chosen from among men is appointed to act on behalf of men in relation to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins.” (Heb 5:1).
The opening to the world called for by Vatican II has often been interpreted, in the years after the Council, as a sort of “conversion to secularization”. This attitude did not lack generosity; however, it led to obscuring the importance of the liturgy, and it minimized careful observance of rites that were considered too distant from the life of the world, which must be loved and with whom one had to be fully connected even to the point of fascination.
The result was a grave crisis of identity of the priest, who could no longer perceive the importance of the salvation of souls and the need to announce to the world the newness of the Gospel of Salvation. The liturgy is, without doubt, the privileged place of deepening the identity of the priest, called to “fight the secularization”; for, as Jesus says, in His priestly prayer: “I pray not that thou shouldst take them out of the world, but that thou shouldst keep them from evil. They are not of the world, as I also am not of the world. Sanctify them in truth. Thy word is truth” (Jn 17:15-17).
This certainly will be possible through a more rigorous observation of the liturgical norms that preserve the priest from the requirement, even the unconscious one, to draw the attention of the faithful to his person: the liturgical ritual which the celebrant is called to receive filially from the Church in fact allows the faithful to come more easily to the presence of Christ the Lord, of which the liturgical celebration must be a telling sign, and which must always come first.
The liturgy is wounded when the faithful are left to the arbitrariness of the celebrant, his quirks, his personal ideas or opinions, to his own wounds. Hence also follows the importance of not banalizing the rites which, tearing us away from the secular world and thus from the temptation of immanentism, have the gift to immerse us suddenly into the Mystery and to open ourselves to the Transcendent.
In this sense, one can never stress enough the importance of the silence preceding the liturgical celebration an inner narthex [church entrance], where we are freed of the concerns, even if legitimate, of the secular world, in order to enter the sacred time and space where God will reveal His Mystery; no less the silence in the liturgy [that leads one] to open oneself more readily to the action of God; and [one can never stress enough] the appropriateness of a period of thanksgiving, whether or not integrated into the celebration, so we can measure the mission that awaits us, once we are back in the world. The obedience of the priest to the rubrics is also itself a silent and eloquent sign of his love for the Church of which he is but the minister, that is to say, the servant.
Hence also the importance of the formation of future priests in the liturgy and especially in the interior participation, without which the outward participation advocated by the reform would be soulless and would favor a partial understanding of the liturgy that would express itself in terms of excessive theatricalization of the roles, reductive cerebralization of the rites and abusive self-celebration of the assembly.
If active participation, which is the operating principle of the liturgical reform, is not the exercise of the “supernatural sense of faith”, the liturgy is no longer the work of Christ, but the work of men.
In insisting on the importance of liturgical formation of priests, the Second Vatican Council made the liturgy one of the principal disciplines of ecclesiastical studies, avoiding reducing it to a purely intellectual formation: in fact, prior to being an object of study, the liturgy is living, or rather, is “to transcend one’s own life to merge into the life of Christ”. It is the ultimate immersion of all Christian life: immersion in the sense of faith and in the sense of the Church, in praise and in adoration, as in the mission.
We are therefore called to a true “Sursum corda”. The phrase from the preface, “lift up your hearts”, introduces the faithful to the heart of hearts of the liturgy: Christ’s Passover, that is, His passing from this world to the Father. The meeting of the Risen Jesus with Mary Magdalene on the morning of the Resurrection is very significant in this sense: with His “Noli me tangere” [Touch me not], Jesus invites Mary Magdalene to “look to the realities of the highest”, making her realize in her heart that He is not yet ascended to the Father and requesting her to go and tell His disciples that He must go up to His God and our God, His Father and our Father.
The liturgy is precisely the place of this elevation, this stretching towards God which gives life a new horizon, and therefore its decisive orientation. Provided that we do not regard it as material available to our all-too-human manipulations, but that we observe, with filial obedience, the prescriptions of the Holy Church.
As Pope Benedict XVI stated in the conclusion of his homily on the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul [June 29, 2008]: “When the world in all its parts has become a liturgy of God, when, in its reality, it has become adoration, then it will have reached its goal and will be safe and sound”.
The Lord Jesus, who became for us the food of truth and love, speaks of the gift of His life and assures us that “if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever” (Jn 6:51). This “eternal life” begins in us even now, thanks to the transformation effected in us by the gift of the Eucharist: “He who eats me will live because of me” (Jn 6:57). These words of Jesus make us realize how the mystery believed and celebrated contains an innate power making it the principle of new life within us and the form of our Christian existence. By receiving the body and blood of Jesus Christ we become sharers in the divine life in an ever more adult and conscious way.… Here the eucharistic celebration appears in all its power as the source and summit of the Church’s life, since it expresses at once both the origin and the fulfillment of the new and definitive worship of God, the logiké latreía. Saint Paul’s exhortation to the Romans in this regard is a concise description of how the Eucharist makes our whole life a spiritual worship pleasing to God: “I appeal to you therefore, my brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship” (Rom 12:1). In these words the new worship appears as a total self-offering made in communion with the whole Church.
Pope Benedict XVI
Sacramentum Caritatis §70
Credit Card Donations
To donate by credit card:
1. Call our office to donate directly: (314) 863-8385, have your name, address and credit card number ready. If you would like automatic donations to Adoremus let us know what date(s) you would like to be billed on.
2. You may also donate by using Network for Good: http://www.networkforgood.org (follow instructions on site)
3. You may donate using PayPal below
US Membership Donation
Foreign Membership Donation
**Adoremus operates solely on your generous donations.**
Adoremus is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Donations are tax deductible.
Site Copyright © 1999 - Present by Adoremus
All rights reserved.
All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Adoremus, except as specified below:
Permission is granted to download and/or print out articles for personal use only.
Brief quotations (ca 500 words) may be made from the material on this site, in accordance with the “fair use” provisions of copyright law without prior permission. For these quotations proper attribution must be made of author and Adoremus + URL (i.e., Adoremus or Adoremus Bulletin www.adoremus.org.)
Generally, all signed articles or graphics must also have the permission of the author. If a text does not have an author byline, Adoremus should be listed as the author. For example: Adoremus (St Louis: Adoremus, 2005 + URL)
Link to Adoremus web site.
Other web sites are welcome to establish links to www.adoremus.org or to individual pages within our site.
Home | Join/Donate | Adoremus Bulletin | Archive | Index | Church Documents | Architecture | Posture | Music | Translation | What's NEW? | FAQ | Search Site | Site Map